XAML vs XUL

posted 2003-10-28

"What's the difference between XAML and XUL?"

Comparisons to XUL have been frequent lately, so I'll address the issue from my (layout-centric) point of view.

As Roger points out: XAML's (and Avalon's) scope is significantly larger than XUL's; XUL was created for constructing Mozilla's GUI, as well as the GUI for applications / services which leverage the Mozilla platform. Avalon is much larger than this. The amount of services and functionality we're providing in Avalon is quite large, and will take a while to digest; but once people start to get it, it'll be clear why XAML is much larger than XUL.

Note: It is difficult to separate XAML and Avalon. XAML is a way to use the Avalon APIs through markup, XAML is translated directly into managed code, calling the same APIs used when constructing an application through code.

There are many other differences -- but my bus ride is over now. I'm certain this isn't the last time I'll be addressing these issues.

Disclaimer: I've poked around with XUL before, but not very thoroughly -- I may have some details wrong here. Feel free to correct me. I've used Dave Hyatt's XUL summary as a refresher.